Price Label Improvements
in progress
This post was marked as
in progress
This post was marked as
planned
D
Darren Hunt
Fantastic - this should have been done years ago. Such a simple thing that affects thousands of customers and colleagues. Such a basic requirement. Four basic requirements - larger font, larger prices, and the ability to show the price or not by item (for warehouse stock) and show was/now prices if selected.
C
Chris
Darren Hunt prefferably with an RRP/Our Price option too.
This post was marked as
in progress
Wade Anderson
I feel that this label should be user customizable. Sad to see that this has been an un-improved thing for so long now. I would like my store name and some more modern fonts on the label. This idea from 2024 would be better than what is current.
Photo Viewer
View photos in a modal
C
Chris
Is there an update as to when these changes will be made?
Also I'm guess RRP or MSRP and Our Price is off the cards because of space limitations??
Suzy Weightman
Merged in a post:
New Label Printers to include store name
G
George Shipman
At the moment, the newest label printers with integrated milestones do not have the ability to have the store name printed on the labels. This is a back step from the old printers, so is this functionality possible?
Suzy Weightman
Merged in a post:
Increase Font Size and Use Bold Font for Price Labels
Toby K Selph Arnett
CURRENT: If a person is over 40, the font on the pricing labels is unreadable (too small and too skinny/faint). Frustrating to customers and employees alike.
RECOMMENDATION: increase font size and use a bold font. Allow customization, if possible.
D
Darren Hunt
I wanted to check if there’s any update on when this will be resolved, as it’s been quite a long time now (coming up to four years). This seems like a fundamental issue, especially considering it's one of the key attributes in a retail environment, and I’m concerned about the ongoing impact.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
B
Brent J
Definitely a feature that should be added.
Load More
→